OK, so I’ve handed in the latest round of changes and Jess phones up. She and Arif have had a long chat and they think we are ignoring the elephant in the room. Basically that the structure in act one is still a bit wobbly and that the stakes are not high enough. We’re fixing all the minor stuff but we don’t seem to be making any headway with that. She has agreed with Arif that we are going to take six weeks out where I can go and try and deal with these issues. She throws out a couple of suggestions just to fire up the gray matter. One of them throws me into a blind panic – she suggests moving the midpoint to the end of the first act. For those who don’t much know, the midpoint in a movie is the point – more often than not literally halfway through the movie. Syd Field summed it up in his book Save The Cat, when he said it was "An important scene in the middle of the script, often a reversal of fortune or revelation that changes the direction of the story." At the moment, ours is occurring on page 48 – halfway through a 95 page movie – it’s the scene where hero makes the decision to allow heroine back into his life. If Jess is suggesting that we move that to page 28, then I have no idea –literally no idea, how to tell that story without changing everything - writing a completely new screenplay to the one we have been working with so far. It’s like Indiana Jones finding the arc of the Covenant on about twenty minutes in – Elliot Ness figuring out how to nail Capone on page 25. She’s saying it’s only a suggestion and making reassuring noises, but I am so full of blind panic all I hear is the voice in my own head going “OhjesusfuckorchristwhatamIgoingotwriteImscrewedomigodomigodomigod”
The next day (after Karen has convinced me to put down the toaster and get out of the bath) I phone Arif and Jess again. We have another longer conversation and I say honestly that I don’t think I can write this. This is as close as I ever come to saying “if you have a relief scribe waiting in the wings, now might be the time to produce him/her”. To me the film splits into two neat halves – hero is getting pushed and then he makes the decision to push back – and by that point (hopefully if we have all done our job well) we the audience are rooting for him to win that we might be willing to forgive him any dodgy moral gray areas that he might find himself in. If we move that decision of his forward, then I not only don’t know how to cram all that pushing into the first twenty minutes, but I also don’t know where the story goes until we get to the start of act 3 on page 70. Jess says to take a step back – forget the moving the midpoint suggestion - and look at act one again – where is the inciting incident – I tell her, and even as the words are coming out of my mouth I know that my inciting incident is a bit bobbins . And where is the act one climax into act 2. I tell her that one – slightly better, but still not quite in the same league as Marion Ravenwoods Nepalese bar burning down. So her suggestion of moving the midpoint was only to try and get the beats to that level. I digest this and sign off to go and have a think. She has insisted that in the six weeks that I have, I don’t go anywhere near a keyboard for at least two, which as it turns out is very good advice. I turn the problem over in my head – what do I want to say. Where am I trying to go? Eventually I come up with an idea and phone up Jess – what happens if we keep the same basic set up but instead this happens. It raises the stakes, it makes hero a bit stronger and it leaves the mid point where it is. Jess and Arif do their huddle and come back to me – yeah, give that a go. I do so. Karen reads it and says she thinks it is the best version yet. I send it to Jess. She knows that I am going on holiday to Greece and says she will not tell me anything about it before I get back. (Jess clearly knows that writers are a needy shower of bastards in constant want of validation)
Back in the day job, I scribble down what are possibly the worst handover notes in the history of the world for Ksenia – basically “stall on everything until I get back” and go to Greece.
Back from Greece and catch up with Jess. We finally have a draft that is ready to go out to cast? To whom I have no idea. At this point I don’t really care. I’m just delighted that it has gone out. Arif also says that Greg Coote has come on board as an executive producer, which is more good news. From a script point of view, the plan is to try and get some talent in place, and get everyone’s input and then try and have another tweak. Arif does not think act one is as funny as it was, which is a valid criticism as I was really focussing on the structure. I can spend the next six weeks trying to come up with yuks and giggles.
So for right now, I have nothing to do but get to work on the next one.
It’s only after I hang up the phone with Arif that a thought occurs to me – there is now a tiny walk on part for a ten year old girl. Maybe I’ll save that conversation for another day.
Friday, 6 November 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Hi John!
ReplyDeletePicked up a link to you blog on Zoetrope. Interesting reading your version of, if I may call it so, 'Development Hell'. Basically I went through the same sort of drill on a couple of screenplays. I was lucky that the first film produced, now in 'Post Production Hell', was also the first film I directed. As director I got to keep a lot of the good stuff in by simply overruling the development guys. If you are not going to direct you should keep in mind that the director who comes onboard will expect a rewrite or two. In my opinion development people, even producers, don't really know it all. So it is important for a writer to stick to his guns on the stuff that makes his script unique. Too often the development process destroys what is at the heart of a script. We’ve all seen too many banal (over developed?) films to know what organization does to beauty that exists in chaos.
Good to see your efforts getting across. I hope to see the film in a theater near me.
Cheers,
Vikram Singh
Hi Vikram,
ReplyDeleteI actually don't think the development was that hellish to be honest with you. I would assume that at least some of the problems came from my own inexperience of how the development process worked. As I said in one post, there was never once a statement from anyone saying "I hate that, it has to go" (well okay one line but it was a terrible line) more a series of questions, and disucssions about what worked, what did not. If I could articulate a valid point as to why I thought something was important, it stayed. I think the script is much stronger now for Jess and Arif's involvement. The blog was not intended as a gripe about development, more my personal experience of how the process worked, including all my panic attacks. Let me put it this way - if I ever got to do another movie, I would be praying that I would be developing it with people as clued in as Jess and Arif.
Hey John,
ReplyDelete'Development hell' is a great term that allows me to play a prima donna, at least in my own head. I'm not knocking the development process per se. I'm glad that it is working for you. A lot of good came out of my development process too. But on hind sight I think we did end up compromising some of the freshness that existed in the newbie draft. Most of the compromises were made from a production/budget stand point. These hurt the most in the long run. It's wonderful to have the benefit of a solid development/edit team followed by the ability to say 'no, lets do it my way because my gut says so'. Because in the end a great script is mostly an accident.
The development process is as much a part of making a film as any other. So enjoy it for itself.
Cheers!
Hi Vikram,
ReplyDeleteInteresting points you raise. The budget thing I think is just a harsh fact of life – you might have a great scene but then you can’t afford to shoot it then what are you going to do? My own thoughts on this are that budget restrictions can breed great creativity – the example I always drag out is Dr. Who’s Tardis. The BBC could not afford a spaceship but they had a policebox. Coming up with a reason to explain the why and the how of that was a work of genius, and has since become one of the most iconic images of science fiction. Think of that scene in Apollo 13 where gene Crantz throws all the crap on the table and says “make a CO2 filter with nothing but the stuff you have available here.” Think how chuffed those guys must have felt when they pulled that one out of the bag. There are development meetings where you have the same basic problem. We have to achieve a goal on limited resources. I for one, get the same satisfaction when we manage it. “Freshness” is an interesting idea. It reminds me of a line Bill Hicks started his show with once – ‘while I’m sure this is all exciting and funny for you, I’ve been doing this for ten years, so excuse me while I slap on a happy grin and plough through this crap just one more time’ Certainly in the development process, you do get to a point where you have read each scene approximately 300 times in the space of two months, and I don’t think there is a script that can stand up to that kind of revision and stay linen cupboard fresh – with the possible exception of Some Like It Hot. But even though the script is supposed to be funny, everyone from the start was focussed on character and motivation – and I think this is the right choice, because humour should come from the characters, and if you try and hang on to a scene or a line that does not serve the plot or come from the characters then you will find yourself in trouble very quickly – your screenplay will just become a random collection of vignettes barely held together. And of course the other factor is that the final product will be the thing the audience sees – so they will never see the other versions that were there before. In one sense, that might indicate that this blog is a mistake – that I should never let anyone behind the scenes to see anyone working the levers of Oz the great and terrible – I actually cleared the idea with Jess and Arif first, but at the same time, I am constantly worried that while people might actually be interested in seeing how development plays out (which is why I started posting this blog) on the other hand I might be doing all a disservice if I give too much of the plot/problems away. Because of that I might speak in more generalities in future. Good to have a discussion with you though, and hope you like the finished product.
Hello,
ReplyDeleteI'm very relieved to find a blog of the past winner of the BFSC online, detailing their experience with Kaos. I'm thinking of submitting my script this Sunday, for the 2010 competition. Thank you very much for making your experiences public!
I read your comment on unkknownscreenwriter.com , where there were a lot of cynical comments RE the BFSC competition. And, then you come on, and your comments have made me a little more optimistic. As a writer, I am, like all writers, concerned of being jipped, having my script changed, trodden all over, re-written by some random nobody (who didn't sweat blood and tears or get to know the script and characters like they were children), and, well, just having your voice totally quelled. It sounds like the BFSC is a little more disposed towards empowering the writer. I hope, that this years competition is the same, and that the same script development people are on board.
A few questions: how is pre-production going? Have you got a cast yet, have you got dates? I.e., has anything been set in stone, or is it all still up in the air? I'm just curious to about the production timeline - how long it takes for the scripts to get read and the finalists announced (six-ish months I believe - the lady I emailed said it varies with the judges), and, how long it takes after the winner has been announced for things to be set in stone, things happening, etc. How long did it take after you won the competition for the ball to be rolling?
And, of course - the question we all want to know - have you had any word RE: money? (Of course, you don't have to mention figures, just if it's been addressed, if they're being "quiet" about it, etc). Do you only get paid once the film is being shot? I think I read that somewhere.
Also - I apologize for being rude, but could I ask what the sort of theme/genre/feel your movie is? Just so I know what sort of scripts they choose. Is it serious/comedy - does it have deep themes, or is it - egads - Hollywoodesque? My movie is character driven, using a story arc as a metaphor for identity (the story arc could be considered a little fantastic - but I try not to make it about the 'story' but the characters. The story is a surface level plot device, not what the movie is 'really about' - if you get what I mean)
Sorry - I apologize if you can't wade through all that to get to the questions. I appreciate any further info you are able to provide! I haven't been through your entire blog yet, but I should be getting around to it.
I also like that they were open to the idea of you getting mates in for music and minor roles (I myself want to cast myself as one of the leads, which is why I'm a little apprehensive to signing my rights to BFSC if won - they might not allow it, yet, if I sold it to a producer, I could make demands "you can't have it if you blah blah" - Of course this comp will be different. I emailed them regarding the strength of the winner's voice. I live in Brisbane, Australia, so I'm glad they're not picking 'popular demographics' like was voiced on unknownscreenwriter.com or avoiding possible political controversies, spoken by the moronic spoon-fed majority, by choosing an Irish writer. It's about the writing! Good on you man for winning. All the best with it.
Thanks heaps again for your experiences! Will be checking back here soon!
-David
Sorry, I do know a little about your movie, looked at the facebook page and from what I could gauge on here. It sounds intriguing! I also know that you were asked if an American actor could be used - and it seems a little shame that you might have to make your character American to avoid Irish accent infelicities. But I suppose if it's not integral to your character it doesn't matter. Cheers.
ReplyDelete